During the session, the court set May 12 as the date for the hearing of the bail application, when both the defence and the prosecution are expected to present their arguments.
The decision will determine whether the accused will be released on bail or continue to be held as the case progresses.
The case relates to the killing of a GSU officer reported at State House last year, an incident that raised serious security concerns given the sensitivity of the location.
Investigators have been working to establish the circumstances surrounding the officer’s death, with authorities treating the matter as a serious criminal offence.
Prosecutors told the court that investigations are ongoing and emphasised the need to keep the suspect in custody to allow for the completion of inquiries.
They argued that releasing the accused at this stage could interfere with witnesses or compromise the integrity of the case.
The defence, on the other hand, is expected to push for the suspect’s release on bail, arguing that he is entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
The court will consider factors such as the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the accused attending court, and any potential risks posed by granting bail.
Legal experts note that decisions on bail are guided by constitutional provisions, which allow for the release of an accused person unless there are compelling reasons to deny it.
In cases involving serious offences, courts often weigh the interests of justice against the rights of the accused.
The killing of the GSU officer has remained under investigation since it occurred, with authorities seeking to piece together evidence and establish accountability.
The case continues to draw attention due to its location and the nature of the allegations.