“ Are Meetings We Were Called to, But Some Leaders Never Showed Up,” Says ODM’s Catherine Omanyo

Fresh debate has emerged within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) after new Secretary General Catherine Omanyo and Senator Richard Onyonka shared differing views on recent internal wrangles.

Speaking in separate forums, Omanyo revealed that there were several party meetings that some leaders failed to attend. 

“Kuna mikutano ambayo tuliitwa lakini wengine hawakufika,” she said, pointing to what she suggested was a lack of unity and coordination within certain ranks of the party.

Her remarks come at a time when ODM has been facing questions about its internal structures and decision-making processes.

While she did not name specific individuals who skipped the meetings, her statement hinted at underlying tensions that may be affecting the party’s operations.

Omanyo, who recently took over the powerful position of Secretary General, appeared cautious in her comments.

She emphasized that there are many issues within the party, but she could not openly discuss some of them.

“Mambo ni mengi na kwa sababu ameenda kortini siwezi yaongelelea,” she said, explaining that since the matter is now before the court, she is limited in what she can publicly reveal.

Her careful choice of words suggests that legal proceedings are underway involving certain party members or decisions.

This has added another layer of complexity to the unfolding situation, as party officials balance internal discussions with court processes.

On his part, Richard Onyonka questioned the credibility of some of the claims being circulated.

He argued that if there is no written letter of evidence criticizing someone, then the matter may simply be propaganda.

“Kama barua ya ushahidi iliyoandikwa ya kumkosoa haipo, basi ni hii yote ni propaganda,” Onyonka said.

His statement appeared to challenge the narrative that there is formal criticism or documented complaints within the party.

By demanding written proof, Onyonka seemed to call for transparency and accountability, suggesting that accusations without documentation should not be taken seriously.

The exchange between the two leaders highlights the delicate balance ODM is trying to maintain as it navigates internal disagreements.

As one of the country’s major political parties, ODM’s stability often has a significant impact on the broader political landscape.

Political analysts say such public statements, even when measured, can signal deeper divisions within a party.

However, they also note that disagreements are common in political organizations, especially when leadership changes or legal issues arise.