The three are associated with the Fighting Brutality and Impunity (FBI) movement, a group that has often spoken out against alleged police misconduct and abuse of power.
Their absence in court raised concern, prompting the magistrate to allow the prosecution’s request for warrants of arrest.
This means law enforcement officers have now been directed to trace and present them before the court to answer to the charges they are facing.
The case against the three activists has attracted public attention because of their outspoken activism and online presence.
Supporters describe them as bold voices who highlight cases of injustice, especially involving security agencies.
Critics, however, argue that some of their actions and statements have been provocative and have crossed legal boundaries.
Court officials emphasized that attending court when required is not optional.
Once a person has been charged and released on bond or summoned to appear, they are expected to respect the court process.
Failure to do so can lead to arrest warrants, cancellation of bond terms, or other legal consequences.
The issuance of the warrants now sets the stage for the next phase of the case.
If arrested, the three activists will be presented before the same court to explain why they failed to attend the hearing.
The magistrate may also decide whether to review their bond terms or take further action depending on the explanation given.