The lawyers argue that this treatment was unnecessary and raised serious issues about the methods used by the police.
They say Tuju had gone to the station to cooperate with authorities, and there was no reason for him to be forcibly detained.
Eyewitness accounts and statements from Tuju’s representatives indicate that the former minister had complied with all procedural requirements at the station.
He was present to provide information and answer questions about the events leading to his disappearance.
However, the lawyers say that instead of facilitating the process, police action escalated the situation, resulting in his arrest.
The arrest comes amid ongoing public interest in Tuju’s disappearance, which had already attracted significant attention from the media and political circles.
Many citizens and leaders had expressed concern about his safety during the period he was unaccounted for.
His resurfacing was initially seen as a relief, but the sudden arrest has reignited debates about security, legal procedures, and the role of law enforcement.
Tuju’s lawyers have called for clarity on the reasons for the arrest, insisting that it should be based on transparent evidence and conducted according to the law.
They argue that any action taken against Tuju must respect his rights as a citizen and a public figure, and that arbitrary detention could undermine public trust in the justice system.
Observers note that the case highlights broader issues about personal security, policing practices, and accountability in high-profile cases.
While law enforcement has a duty to investigate allegations and ensure public safety, experts stress that such investigations must balance authority with the rights of individuals involved.
The situation has also drawn reactions from political leaders, human rights groups, and members of the public.
Many are calling for immediate explanations from the police, including why Tuju was arrested after voluntarily reporting to the station.
Questions have also been raised about the use of force and whether standard procedures were followed.
At the time of reporting, Tuju’s legal team was seeking urgent intervention to ensure his safety and to clarify the legal basis for his detention.
They emphasized the need for accountability and transparency to prevent similar incidents in the future.