Justice Mwamuye ordered that the status quo existing before the disputed decision be restored and maintained until the matter is heard and determined through an inter partes hearing.
Yusuf moved to court through his lawyer, Danstan Omari, challenging the legality of resolutions made against him by the FKF NEC.
In his petition, he argues that the meeting at which the decisions were made was irregular, unlawful, unconstitutional, and procedurally unfair.
According to court documents, Yusuf claims he was neither notified of the meeting nor invited to attend and respond to the allegations levelled against him.
He contends that this amounted to a violation of his right to fair administrative action and due process.
The conservatory orders effectively shield Yusuf from any disciplinary action by the federation until the court determines the validity of his claims.
The case now shifts to a full hearing, where both parties will have the opportunity to present their arguments.
The dispute highlights ongoing governance and leadership challenges within FKF, with the latest court intervention underscoring the role of the judiciary in resolving internal conflicts within sporting bodies.
Such cases often raise broader questions about adherence to constitutional principles and organisational procedures in sports administration.
Legal experts note that conservatory orders are typically issued to preserve the subject matter of a dispute and prevent irreparable harm before a case is fully heard.
In this instance, the court found sufficient grounds to maintain Yusuf in office until the issues raised in his petition are conclusively addressed.