During the service, Ng’ang’a invited his wife to greet congregants, using the moment to reflect on her background and transformation.
He spoke openly about her life before joining him, drawing attention to her earlier circumstances and how her life had changed over time.
“There is a certain woman I was with, let her greet you and tell you where she comes from, especially how you are being attacked.
You should always explain yourself because women will go far. I removed you from Mukuru kwa Njenga,” he stated.
The remarks, delivered in front of congregants, immediately drew attention both in the church and later online after clips of the service began circulating on social media platforms.
The preacher’s choice of words, particularly the reference to Mukuru kwa Njenga, became a focal point of discussion among viewers who interpreted the statement in different ways.
Murugi Maina, however, responded calmly when given the opportunity to address the congregation.
Introducing herself, she described her spiritual journey and emphasized her identity as a born-again Christian.
She also acknowledged the changes she has experienced in her life, including her relocation to Karen, which she framed as part of her personal growth and transformation.
Her composed response contrasted with the intensity of discussion generated by her husband’s remarks, with many observers noting her calmness and measured tone while speaking to the congregation.
In her brief address, she focused on faith and personal development rather than responding directly to the controversial phrasing used by Ng’ang’a.
Following the service, the exchange quickly became a topic of widespread debate online.
Social media users reacted with mixed opinions, with some praising Murugi for her composure and confidence in addressing the congregation despite the sensitive reference to her past.
Others interpreted the moment differently, sparking humour, criticism, and reflection on how personal histories are discussed publicly, especially within religious settings.
Supporters of the couple argued that the remarks were intended to highlight transformation and testimony, a common theme in church settings where personal journeys are often shared as examples of change.
Critics, however, felt that the public reference to her past circumstances could have been handled with more discretion.
The incident has since added to ongoing conversations about boundaries in public preaching, the role of testimonies in church services, and how personal relationships are presented before congregations.