Speaking on the party’s current trajectory, Kang’ata argued that UDA’s rise to power was partly driven by how it was treated by the then ruling Jubilee Party administration.
He noted that the perceived political pressure and hostility directed at UDA at the time helped galvanise public support.
“UDA won in 2022 because of how it was persecuted by Jubilee government, I'm surprised when I see UDA repeating the same mistake,” Kang’ata said.
His remarks point to growing concern over the party’s internal and external political approach, with the governor suggesting that replicating such tactics could have unintended consequences.
While he did not specify particular actions, his statement implies that strategies perceived as suppressive or exclusionary could shift public sentiment.
Kang’ata’s comments come at a time when political discourse is intensifying ahead of the 2027 General Election, with leaders increasingly weighing in on party conduct and governance.
His observations highlight the delicate balance political parties must maintain in managing both internal dynamics and public perception.
According to the governor, the 2022 election outcome demonstrated how voters can rally behind a political movement that appears to be under pressure or facing unfair treatment.
He suggested that this dynamic could easily work in reverse if similar conditions are created for other political actors.
Political analysts note that Kang’ata’s remarks may be interpreted as a warning to the ruling party to remain mindful of its actions, particularly in how it engages with opponents and dissenting voices.
They argue that Kenya’s political environment has often been shaped by shifting alliances and public reactions to perceived injustices.
The governor has in recent months taken positions that reflect an independent stance on various political issues, occasionally diverging from dominant party narratives.
His latest comments add to a growing conversation about the future direction of UDA and its preparedness for the next electoral cycle.
While Kang’ata did not directly criticise specific leaders within the party, his statement underscores broader concerns about governance, inclusivity, and political strategy.
It also raises questions about how lessons from past elections are being applied in the current context.