“William Ruto is a very good personal friend. I feel so bad that some people are trying to put this as if it is a personal tiff, no, just like the way you have some political disagreements. I have nothing personal against Ruto,” he said.
The governor’s remarks come at a time when his recent statements on the political direction of the Mt Kenya region have sparked debate, with some interpreting them as a sign of a possible fallout with the Head of State.
Kang’ata sought to dispel such perceptions, insisting that political leaders can disagree on policy and strategy while maintaining mutual respect.
He underscored the importance of separating personal relationships from political positions, noting that disagreements are a normal part of democratic engagement.
According to Kang’ata, differing views should be seen as constructive rather than divisive, provided they are handled with respect and maturity.
At the same time, the governor remained non-committal about his future political choices, particularly regarding his support for President Ruto in upcoming elections.
He indicated that any decision on the matter would be made at the appropriate time.
“I will make the decision on whether I will vote for Ruto when the time comes, not now,” he added.
His statement is likely to fuel further discussion about shifting political allegiances within key regions, especially as leaders begin to position themselves ahead of the next electoral cycle.
While Kang’ata stopped short of outlining a clear political direction, his remarks suggest a cautious approach as he navigates evolving dynamics within the political landscape.
Observers note that such positions are not uncommon, particularly among leaders seeking to balance loyalty, public expectations, and changing political realities.
Kang’ata’s insistence on maintaining personal ties while keeping his political options open reflects the complexities of leadership in a competitive environment.