He said leadership in such a major company must reflect accountability, transparency, and responsibility to the public.
According to him, there are growing concerns about how the company is being run, which he believes require urgent attention.
The MCA claimed that Ndegwa’s leadership approach has raised questions among stakeholders and members of the public.
He suggested that the company risks losing public trust if leadership decisions are not openly explained.
Alai insisted that leaders of large corporations, especially those with significant influence on the country’s economy, must operate in a way that protects public interest and maintains confidence among customers and investors.
The remarks came as political discussion intensified following Nyoro’s warning to the government.
Nyoro argued that Safaricom is a strategic national asset and any attempt to sell shares without public awareness could create concerns about transparency.
His threat to release buyers’ contact details has drawn mixed reactions, with some leaders supporting his push for openness while others have warned that such statements could create unnecessary tension or privacy concerns.
Alai appeared to support the broader call for scrutiny of Safaricom’s management and ownership decisions.
He stressed that if public confidence in the company continues to weaken, leadership changes might become necessary.
However, he did not provide detailed examples of actions by the CEO that he believes justify his removal.
Safaricom remains a key player in Kenya’s economy, offering telecommunications, internet services, and mobile financial solutions that support businesses, government services, and everyday transactions.
Because of its wide influence, any discussion about its leadership or ownership often attracts strong political and public attention.
Economic analysts say that debates involving major companies like Safaricom must be handled carefully to avoid affecting investor confidence or market stability.
They note that while public accountability is important, discussions around corporate leadership and shareholding require clear information and responsible communication.
