The confrontation drew the attention of other members, forcing the Senate leadership to intervene in a bid to restore order.
It remains unclear what led to the immediate escalation, but the development followed concerns over the governor’s alleged failure to honour previous summons or comply with directives issued by the Senate.
The arrest warrant is understood to have been issued as part of efforts to compel his appearance and cooperation with the ongoing proceedings.
During the commotion, security officers attached to Parliament were forced to step in to manage the situation and prevent further escalation.
Their intervention helped separate those involved and allowed proceedings to continue, albeit briefly.
The incident has raised concerns over decorum within the Senate and the manner in which disputes involving county officials are handled.
Observers noted that such confrontations undermine the dignity of the House and could set a worrying precedent.
Some senators were heard expressing frustration over what they described as disregard for the authority of the Senate by certain county leaders.
They insisted that all officials summoned must comply fully with the law and respect parliamentary processes.
At the same time, others called for calm and urged their colleagues to handle the matter within the confines of the law, emphasising the need to uphold institutional integrity.
Governor Lelelit did not immediately comment on the incident, and it was not clear whether he would be taken into custody following the issuance of the warrant.
The Senate has in recent months intensified its oversight role over county governments, summoning governors and other officials to answer questions on financial management, project implementation, and compliance with audit findings.
The confrontation involving the Samburu governor is likely to spark debate on how far the Senate can go in enforcing its authority and the appropriate mechanisms for handling non-compliance.
Legal experts say that while the Senate has powers to summon and demand accountability from county officials, enforcement actions must be carried out in accordance with established legal procedures to avoid controversy.