In his directive, Tuju emphasised the need for urgency in the handling of his burial, stating that the 48-hour timeline should be strictly observed under such circumstances.
He did not elaborate further on the specific reasons behind the timeline but maintained that it was a precautionary measure.
The former CS has in recent times been vocal about what he describes as threats to his safety.
He has raised concerns over the conduct of state agencies, alleging that he could be targeted due to his positions on certain matters.
His latest statement adds to a series of claims in which he has called for accountability and transparency from authorities.
Tuju’s directive has drawn attention from political observers and the public, with many interpreting it as a reflection of the level of anxiety among some leaders regarding their security.
Others have called for calm, urging that any concerns be addressed through legal and institutional channels.
The issue of personal safety for public figures has been a subject of debate in recent years, with calls for stronger safeguards and adherence to the rule of law.
Tuju’s remarks are likely to reignite discussions on the role of state agencies and the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals, regardless of their political standing.
While Tuju did not provide additional details about specific threats, his statement underscores the seriousness with which he views the situation.
He has previously maintained that his actions and positions are guided by principle, and that he will continue to speak out despite the challenges he faces.
Leaders and stakeholders have continued to stress the importance of ensuring that all Kenyans are treated fairly and that due process is followed in all circumstances.
They have also called for restraint in public discourse, noting that statements touching on personal safety can have far-reaching implications.