According to the ruling, investigators did not provide technical or forensic evidence directly linking the student to the specific social media account or device used to publish the information.
“The burden of proof lies with the prosecution,” the court emphasized. Without proper evidence tying Mokaya to the alleged post, the case could not stand.
The decision was welcomed by Mokaya’s supporters, who maintained from the beginning that he had been wrongly accused.
Some of them argued that the case raised wider concerns about freedom of expression and the responsibility of authorities to thoroughly investigate digital offences before making arrests.
On the other hand, the prosecution maintained that the charges had been brought forward in good faith based on initial findings.
However, the court made it clear that legal standards must be met beyond reasonable doubt.
Legal experts say the ruling highlights the importance of proper digital investigations in cases involving online content.
In today’s world, where information spreads quickly through social media, proving who exactly posted certain material can sometimes be complicated.
Courts, however, must rely on verifiable evidence such as data records, device analysis, and confirmed account ownership.
The acquittal also serves as a reminder that every accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
The judge stressed that criminal responsibility cannot be based on assumptions or public pressure.
For Mokaya, the ruling brings an end to what had been a stressful period. As a student, he now has the opportunity to return to his studies without the weight of a criminal case hanging over him.
