However, despite honouring the summons and submitting the required documents, the governor made it clear that he would not proceed with the session until the dispute between governors and senators is resolved.
“The committee is aware there is a stalemate between the Council of Governors and the Senate about appearing before this committee,” Orengo said.
He maintained that his decision was guided by the collective position taken by governors under the CoG, which has raised concerns over the manner in which Senate committees conduct oversight of county governments.
“I am seeking the indulgence of the committee. Having produced the documents, I would not be comfortable moving any further step in defiance of the resolution of the Council of Governors.
I urge the committee and the CoG to resolve that question, so I beg to decline to move beyond the appearance and taking of oath,” he added.
The standoff between the Senate and the CoG has centred on the interpretation of oversight roles, with governors arguing that certain procedures adopted by Senate committees undermine established frameworks for accountability.
On the other hand, senators have insisted on their constitutional mandate to scrutinise the use of public funds by county governments.
Orengo’s move reflects the broader tension between the two institutions, which has in recent months escalated into a push-and-pull over how governors should appear before Senate committees.
While some governors have complied with summons and participated fully in hearings, others have adopted a more cautious approach in line with CoG resolutions.
Members of the Public Accounts Committee acknowledged the governor’s presence but were left in a difficult position as he declined to respond to questions.
The committee is mandated to examine reports of the Auditor-General and ensure that public resources are used prudently.
The impasse now places the spotlight on ongoing negotiations between the Senate and the Council of Governors, with calls growing for a clear framework to guide appearances and engagements between the two levels of government.
Observers warn that prolonged disagreements could hinder effective oversight and delay the resolution of audit queries affecting counties.
There are also concerns that the stalemate could set a precedent that weakens accountability mechanisms if not addressed promptly.
Orengo reiterated his willingness to cooperate once the dispute is resolved, emphasising that his decision should not be interpreted as defiance but as adherence to a collective position.