However, as investigations progressed, officers reportedly found inconsistencies in his statements.
Sources close to the probe now say that the claims of being trailed and abducted may not have been true.
This has led to accusations that Tuju may have misled law enforcement officers.
Authorities say such reports are taken very seriously because they can cause unnecessary panic and divert security resources from real threats.
If proven that the information was false, it could raise legal questions about giving misleading statements to the police.
The matter has drawn public attention, especially given Tuju’s profile as a former senior government official.
Many observers say the case highlights the importance of accuracy and honesty when dealing with security agencies.
Investigators are said to be reviewing all available evidence, including witness statements and any supporting material that could help establish what exactly happened.
They are working to determine whether there was any real threat to Tuju or if the situation was misrepresented from the start.
So far, Tuju has not publicly responded in detail to the latest accusations.
It remains unclear how he plans to address the claims or whether he will challenge the findings of the investigators.
His silence has left room for speculation, with different sides offering their own interpretations of the situation.
Legal experts note that making a false report to police is a serious matter under the law.
They explain that such actions can interfere with investigations and waste valuable time and resources.
As a result, anyone found to have knowingly provided false information could face consequences.
At the same time, some observers have urged caution, noting that investigations are still ongoing.
They stress that it is important to allow the process to be completed before drawing firm conclusions about the case.