Political analyst Paul Ouma has delivered a sharp rebuke of President William Ruto, characterising his presidency as one of Kenya’s most consequential political miscalculations.
In remarks shared by The Kenya Times on January 13, 2026, Ouma accused the head of state of betraying public confidence and failing to honour the promises that propelled him to power.
According to Ouma, President Ruto’s leadership has been defined by unfulfilled pledges and deliberate misdirection.
“He marketed hope, imposed hardship, and handed governance over to public relations experts,” Ouma remarked.
He argued that the administration has replaced genuine accountability with political spin, converting promises into justifications and explanations into misleading narratives.
The outspoken commentator’s remarks echo a growing sense of dissatisfaction among critics who believe the current government has fallen short in addressing the economic and social pressures affecting everyday Kenyans.
In Ouma’s assessment, image management has taken precedence over tangible policy outcomes.
The post, accompanied by images of both Ouma and President Ruto, has circulated widely online, reigniting debate about the president’s record in office.
Although Ouma did not single out specific policies, his critique conveyed deep concern over the broader direction of the administration.
President Ruto, who campaigned on a platform centred on economic recovery and inclusive leadership, has increasingly come under scrutiny amid rising living costs and what critics describe as slow progress on critical reforms.
Ouma’s comments join a growing chorus of voices questioning whether the president has met the expectations he set during the campaign period.
As Kenya continues to grapple with economic uncertainty and political tension, such critiques highlight the ongoing demand for transparency, accountability, and responsive leadership at the highest level of government.
Whether Ouma’s assessment reflects wider public sentiment remains uncertain, but it underscores the intense scrutiny that inevitably follows those entrusted with national leadership.