Court of Appeal Stops Plea Taking in Ksh100 Million Karen Land Dispute Case

Akoth
0
The Court of Appeal of Kenya in Nairobi has temporarily stopped criminal proceedings against prominent lawyer Guy Spencer Elms in a high-profile land dispute involving property worth about Ksh100 million in Karen.

The decision means that the planned plea taking at the Milimani Law Courts will not go on until the appellate court hears and decides the appeal filed in the matter.

Spencer Elms is facing criminal charges linked to a complaint lodged by businesswoman and politician Agnes Kagure Kariuki. 

The dispute centers on issues surrounding the will of a British billionaire and ownership of land located in Karen, one of Nairobi’s most valuable residential areas.

In an order dated February 23, 2026, three appellate judges—Patrick Omwenga Kiage, Jamila Mohammed and Linnet Ndolo—directed that the current situation in the case remain unchanged until the appeal is fully heard and determined.

The judges made it clear that no further action should be taken at the lower court for now.

“Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, the status quo shall be maintained, meaning that there shall be no taking of a plea or other proceedings at the magistrates’ court,” the judges ruled in their directive.

This order effectively pauses the criminal case that had been scheduled to proceed before a magistrate at the Milimani courts.

As a result, the lawyer will not be required to take a plea or participate in any other proceedings until the appellate court makes its final decision.

The dispute has drawn attention due to the high value of the land involved and the individuals connected to the matter.

The Karen area is known for its large residential properties and has long been considered one of Nairobi’s most exclusive neighborhoods.

At the center of the case are allegations tied to the handling of the estate of a British billionaire whose property interests include the contested land.

The complaint filed by Kagure led to criminal proceedings being initiated against Spencer Elms.

However, the lawyer moved to the Court of Appeal seeking orders to stop the proceedings, arguing that certain issues needed to be reviewed before the case could move forward in the lower court.

By granting the order to maintain the status quo, the appellate judges have given both sides time to present their arguments before the court decides whether the criminal proceedings should continue.

Legal experts say such orders are sometimes issued when a higher court believes that allowing the lower court process to continue could complicate or interfere with the appeal being considered.

Tags

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Post a Comment (0)

#buttons=(Ok, Go it!) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Check Out
Ok, Go it!
To Top